|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mfume Apocal
Origin.
Black Legion.
148
   |
Posted - 2011.12.06 20:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
Goose99 wrote:AC grid usage is small enough that cane can fit 2 1600mms after the rack of ACs. Canes don't brawl, not because they can't, but because: why brawl when you can kite.  Kite > brawl. Only the fastest boats can kite, that would be Winmatar. The rest can either brawl (with non Winmatar boats), or pop (to Winmatar boats).
You're just silly if you think only Minmatar ships can kite. Double web nanodrake will kite a nanocane all day long.
|
Mfume Apocal
Origin.
Black Legion.
148
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 20:40:00 -
[2] - Quote
double post goddamn. these forums suck |
Mfume Apocal
Origin.
Black Legion.
151
|
Posted - 2011.12.08 08:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Thelron wrote:As for "ACs never get to do full damage so they're fine," AC's (projectiles in general) do "most" damage for a MUCH wider band than anything else and really only need to change ammo in order to change damage types.
In order to change damage types and have full damage, you have to stick to stick with EMP, PP or fusion. I don't know exactly what you meant by "most" but the range they get 50% of their DPS is a whooping 18km on a hull w/o falloff bonus. For 75% of their DPS, you're looking at around 12-13km. I really hope you don't think lasers and HAMs are quite that range limited. |
Mfume Apocal
Origin.
Black Legion.
152
|
Posted - 2011.12.08 11:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
Grog Barrel wrote:meanwhile @ amarr engineering headquarters:
"10% energy usage for X turret"
-Awesome Carthum Conglomerate, next time thought try making guns less cap hungry by themselves, so we dont waste a whole ship bonus for this.
the vaga gives a up a bonus for speed, but the faster cynabal, does not. figure that one out.
|
Mfume Apocal
Origin.
Black Legion.
153
|
Posted - 2011.12.09 03:59:00 -
[5] - Quote
Thelron wrote:Fair enough, no, HAMs aren't going to evaporate before -50% ammo-using 425s. Lasers probably *are* going to want a crystal change if you're moving between 1k and 13k on them, and are you really suggesting someone using Heavy Neutrons have a 12km-wide "actually effective" band with AM given that hands them a 1.5km base optimal and 2.5km base falloff?
I deliberately said nothing about blasters at all. |
|
|
| |
|